The Thanet Star

Kent TV, it's just a blog ya'know

Kent TV, it's KCCs extraordinarily expensive Vlog (Video blog) with a custom flash player, but is it actually any good. Tony clearly has an opinion but what about the rest of us?

In short is it the Huffington Post of Kent Communications or the Pownce of video?

Culture Note for newer blog fans: The world of blogging can be divided into pre Huffington and post Huffington because it completely redefined what was possible whereas pownce is has been shut down by new owners Six Apart for being massively unpopular and a massive cost drain.

Kent TV has going for it £1.4 million in backing and has had "one million visitors" that's a cost per person of £1.40. While this is not unreasonable that's not exactly value for money when you consider Google sells traffic in the form of the AdWords program for as little as 1p a click (after you convert from dollars). Assuming that they are not counting hits but something crude but more indicative (say video stream requests given videos auto play the moment I allow flash to be enabled) at an unspecified audience quality I could supply that same level of traffic for around 0.75 million

It has provided 1,400 giving an average cost of £714.29 per video. A straw poll of videos shows the length to fall between 4.5 and 12 minutes with the average being about 7. That means that each video cost £100 a minute to make meaning if they were feature length they would cost around £90,000 each. Yet what value are each of these videos?

And here is another question - they make massive assumptions about the technical ability of the browsers, computers and users of the site. They assume that I am too stupid to pick the optimum quality level for my bandwidth, that my browser and every one else's uses JavaScript and that I have flash installed and up to date.

If that one was a bit on the geeky side what about this. Kent TV is there is create discussion but a debate in a media to which we the people are not invited. We are expected to listen only but not contribute. The blogging revolution, the Web 2.0 culture, the rise of social media has been about breaking old one way communication methods and making them two way. But by locking out opposing discussion they are saying "you are too dumb to contribute" we the old media are in control.

Frankly I don't much care for that. If the world would go back to that way of playing then China Gate, the Sericol leak and a number of other vital stories would never have seen the light of day. Instead we can ask the hard questions and expect to get answers. Kent TV is, in my opinion, an attempt to jump on a band wagon that is not so well understood with unclear aims beyond taking control of an unoccupied niche.

YouTube make no such assumptions and offer me the fastest version they have and know that I'll pick Hi Def if I care to use it. YouTube trust me to paste a flash embed segment of code into my own blog but KentTV expect me to allow them to run JavaScript from their site on mine. Just so you know if Kent TV is ever significantly compromised the crackers will be able to run cross site scripting attacks on every single site with KentTV code. What's more my site is not good enough to get the highest quality version - I have to make do with the external only edition which they don't use internally.

In short Kent TV appears to reinvent the wheel and has not done the best job possible. Where it a start up it would be laughed at by the big boys. Consider that only recently has Kent TV with it's million pound budget over taken Thanet Star's alexa rank (an indicator of the rate of visitation) and only then by a negligible 50,000 places in the world ranking of sites with 19.2% of it's traffic coming from outside the UK (compared to our 14%).

That has both of us beating TDC's website by the way.

Do you recall that niche I spoke of just moments ago. That Local TV niche. It would be a simple mater for a group with substantially less money to do better than Kent TV with little more than a digital video camera and some passion for their home area. Thanet springs to mind as having that passion and that group identity.

It falls once more to us to take the lead in social and online media and show the world that we the people control the news and do not stand for hijacked or personal agendas. We will communicate and we will have answers.


Furl Newsvine Spurl.net reddit Tailrank del.icio.us BlinkList linkaGoGo Shadows Simpy digg kinja Magnolia Squidoo Technorati Yahoo My Web AskJeeves Google Windows Live Favorites

Think you can do better? · read more items categorised Blogging · Don't miss a thing: Subscribe Today · Help: what's a feed? · This site is operated on set principles of policy and disclosure read them here

Public Comments

Dave wrote:

ThanetStar, I understand that bloggers have to quote their freedom to express under the Human rights laws otherwise somebody will try to shut you up when mentioning Kent TV. A tactic employed by the late crook, one Robert Maxwell.
The actual value of the contract awarded to the contractor was £1.2 million over 2 years so the cost per film is lower than your figure.
(plus KCC's own start up costs and all the time spent on it by councillors.)
The contractors spokesperson has recently said this on KentTV:

----------
Bob Geldof on . . . Criticism of Kent TV
In this case it's old media versus new media – it’s the old establishment versus new kids on the block – then it's normal. And it's obviously commercially driven. They fear, I think, the local papers fear that they are going to lose revenues. But empirically, that's just not so.

This spurious beating up of Kent TV, on the notion that it's political is rubbish. It's a commercial attack. So, do it honourably and compete with us. We'll win because we’re better, and regardless of who initiated this in Kent, they showed foresight. so competing on the commercial level, I love it, I love the challenge and if we lose, we lose ‘cos we’re not good enough, but competing, playing footsie with your political pals, ah that’s naff and it’s not what business should do.
--------
Its seems to me that the Kent based media companies are both old and new media and the proof of who is best will come when they are on a level playing field with existing internet and media companies.

So far the predicted revenues have not materialised so local media has not lost out here. Its reported by the old media that KCC are considering funding KentTV for another year after the pilot - only another £400,000!
11/12/2008 18:45:58

Matt B wrote:

I stand slightly corrected on the subject of the costs. Thank you Dave. I was quoting the BBC and should have known better than to take a source on trust.

As for the local papers some of the editors for the nationals having been proclaiming their doom for a while now.

too be honest though any of the local media groups KM especially have been able to attempt this for some time that they have not is their loss.
11/12/2008 20:31:05

Dave wrote:

Matt B, The doom of newspapers was being predicted when I worked in IT for the then Mirror Group (IPC) in 1967. The Development Director was a leading practitioner of the day the late Stafford Beer, and he put fear into the Board concerning the future of the printer word. His team started to spend too much and the plug was pulled on a lot of his plans.
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...">Stafford Beer</a>
11/12/2008 21:20:24

Matt B wrote:

Yes the end of the printed media has been widely and incorrectly reported but the likelihood of survival for our local papers looks grim.

Mr Beer sounds like he was an interesting chap. I would have liked to have met him.
12/12/2008 08:37:02

Add Comment

Please note that while email addresses may be given via this form they are not shown to anyone but the editor. This change is retrospective and has hidden all email addresses so that people wishing anonymity may have it.

This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it

If you have a blog or other website of your own leaving the URL in this form will create a "do follow" link for Joined Up Blogging at the top of your comment.

Supporting Thanet traders

The following ebay listings are largely from Thanet based members (although items with a strong Thanet theme may also be included).

 

Tweets from @thanetstar

ThanetStar.com - 3 of the best from Thanet http://bit.ly/d29cG1
2010-03-13T22:05:31Z
ThanetStar.com - Can the Turner Centre save Thanet? http://bit.ly/9FJ42m
2010-03-12T22:15:42Z
ThanetStar.com - High Speed Rail - Gold or Glib? http://bit.ly/deJIBk
2010-03-10T22:26:15Z
ThanetStar.com - Thanet News Round Up http://bit.ly/aQoDYD
2010-03-09T13:11:03Z

Thanet Star's (old) Microblog

 Get Microblog by feed

Thanet's only microblog - tiny wee blog posts from Thanet.

No spam today, thank you.

Any more losers posting as Oes Tsetnoc for this lame SEO/Spam contest are going to get a full letter of complaint to their ISP.

Comment Feed

I could have sworn this was available already. RSS Comments Feed for the main blog.

Comments

I've increased the spam detectors sensitivity and set older posts to close automatically in order to keep ahead of the spammers. If you find it eats your posts @thanetstar me on twitter.

Recent Comments

Matt B says It's hard not to see that as desperate.

Peter Checksfie... says And don't forget of the 197 that showed up many (most?) were forced to do so by...

Matt B says I agree with you, James, that Google is powerful and important but to see them as...

James says This is an excellent article and I just wanted to say that Google announced that...

Naughty User says [Naughty IP: 84.114.144.178] Wow, that would make me mad. It's such a disturbance. I...

TROLL says Disemvoweled! (41.117.72.154)Vr cl rtcl, kp p th xcllnt wrk. hv t mntn tht r blg...

TROLL says Disemvoweled! (116.73.129.12)Wbspchstng Wb Hstng...

TROLL says Disemvoweled! (116.73.129.12)Wbspchstng Wb Hstng...

Sir Head says Its a good point - who was the developer that wanted to build 26 houses there - not...

Richard Eastcli... says Sorry to hear this Matt. Hope you get the bastards, whoever they are!

Matt B says The question is not how many search engines use meta tags but how much traffic can...

Matt B says Thank you.

Get the latest comments by feed

The Thanet Star

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Thanet Finder: Search Thanet

Thanet Finder is Thanet's search engine created by people like me and you.



The following links area provided as is. Thanet Star is not responsible for the content of third party sites.

Additional Points of Presence

Technology Tips

Keep safe online with an anti-virus, firewall and malware protection. I can recomend F-Secure Internet Security 2010

Compatable inks can save you money click here for ink cartridges with free delivery (UK ONLY)


Contact Matt

If you would like to chat with Thanet Star's Editor Matt B then a number of options are available to you. (You can also leave a message).

If you have a twitter.com account (which is free) you might like to @ThanetStar.

If you are a skype user you can chat live whenever he is online. The indicator below shows when Matt is on Skype. Am I online with skype:

My status

You can also get hold of him on Yahoo IM, MSN IM and GTalk if you know how. However, the screen name(s) he uses on these services are not public.

Connect with Matt on twitter as @thanetstar

Talk with Matt on facebook

Matthew Brown's Facebook Profile

Connect on Live in Thanet